Legal Opinion
Horowitz v. Federal Kemper Life Assurance Co.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided November 27, 1996No. Civil Action 93-192PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, District Judge.
Plaintiff Dona Horowitz is the named beneficiary of a $1,000,000.00 life insurance policy which defendant Federal Kemper Life Assurance Company (“Kemper”), issued on the life of her now deceased husband, Dr. Leonard N. Horowitz. 1 Following Dr. Horowitz’s death, Kemper refused to pay the proceeds of the policy contending that Dr. Horowitz committed fraud by failing to disclose that he was dying of cancer in a December 20, 1991, amendment to the policy application. Plaintiffs brought suit to recover the insurance proceeds and defendant…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Dona W. Horowitz, Individually and as Co-Executrix of the Estate of Leonard N. Horowitz, Deceased Alfred Camner, Co-Executor of the Estate of Leonard N. Horowitz, Deceased v. Federal Kemper Life Assurance Company, in No. 94-1900. Dona W. Horowitz, Individually and as Co-Executrix of the Estate of Leonard N. Horowitz, Deceased Alfred Camner, Co-Executor of the Estate of Leonard N. Horowitz, Deceased, in No. 94-1901 v. Federal Kemper Life Assurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Dan Lind v. Schenley Industries IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960
- Elliot Fineman the Industry Network System, Inc. v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- ID Security Systems Canada, Inc. v. Checkpoint Systems, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2003
- O'GRADY v. British AirwaysDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2001
- Hudson v. COLUMBIAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANYDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021