Legal Opinion

In Re Disciplinary Action Against Larsen

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 27, 1990No. C0-89-1404PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Per curiam

Following a 4-day hearing, Judge Jack J. Litman, referee, found that respondent Dean D. Larsen had violated certain Rules of Professional Conduct and recommended disbarment. The most serious misconduct grew out of respondent’s handling of the financial affairs of his mother’s elderly cousin, Mollie Miller.

The Director of the Professional Responsibility Board must prove misconduct by clear and convincing evidence. In re Schmidt, 402 N.W.2d 544, 545 (Minn. 1987). This court will not set aside the findings of a referee in a disciplinary action unless they are clearly erroneous. The court has…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Matter of Discipline of SchmidtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  2. Petition of Disciplinary Action Against DafferSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  3. In Re Disciplinary Action Against RuhlandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  4. In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against PetersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  5. In Re Disciplinary Action Against MunnsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. In Re Disciplinary Action Against GheritySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  2. In Re Disciplinary Action Against SwerineSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
  3. In Re Disciplinary Action Against BartaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  4. In re X.Y.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  5. In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against AnderleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API