Legal Opinion
Saldana v. Kmart Corp.
District Court, Virgin Islands
Decided December 20, 1999No. CIV.1995-90MPublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, District Judge
MEMORANDUM
The defendant, Kmart Corporation ["Kmart" or "defendant"], has moved to exclude the opinion of plaintiff's expert witness, Rosie Mackay ["Mackay"], and filed a motion for summary judgment. The plaintiff, Marie Saldana ["Saldana" or "plaintiff"], has opposed both motions. For the reasons set forth below, the Court will grant Kmart's motions both to exclude the testimony of Rosie Mackay and for summary judgment. The Court also rules on Kmart's motion for sanctions against plaintiff's counsel.
I. FACTS
On or about April 20, 1995, Saldana was shopping at Kmart's store located in St.…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Marie Saldana v. Kmart Corporation Marie Saldana, in No. 99-4055Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- United States v. RoebuckDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 2003
- Rajbahadoorsingh v. Chase Manhattan Bank, NA.District Court, Virgin Islands · 2001
- Government of the Virgin Islands v. LansdaleDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 2001
- United States Ex. Rel. Virgin Islands Housing Authority v. Coastal General Construction Services Corp.District Court, Virgin Islands · 2004
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.