Legal Opinion
Marie Saldana v. Kmart Corporation Marie Saldana, in No. 99-4055
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided July 23, 2001No. 99-4055 and 00-3749PublishedCited by 574 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McKEE, RENDELL and BARRY, Circuit Judges
OPINION OF THE COURT
This case arises from a slip-and-fall suffered by Marie Saldana at a Kmart store on St. Croix. Ms. Saldana appeals the grant of summary judgment against her while her attorney, Lee Rohn, Esq., appeals the imposition of sanctions against her for her out-of-court vulgar language in a handful of cases, including this one. The tortuous procedural history that has led to the consolidation of a slip in a puddle of car wax with sanctions for vulgar language need not detain us. Suffice it to say that we have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. S…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by574 opinions
- Pappas v. City of LebanonDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2004
- Makky v. ChertoffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- Mitchell v. DodrillDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
- First Bank of Marietta, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Hartford Underwriters Insurance Company, Defendant-Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
- Tracinda Corp. v. Daimlerchrysler AgCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
569 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.