Legal Opinion

Government of the Virgin Islands v. Lansdale

District Court, Virgin Islands

Decided July 30, 2001No. CIV.1998-243MRPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

MOORE, District Judge.

William and Marianthi Lansdale [the “Lansdales”] have moved to dismiss the case or for entry of summary judgment. The Virgin Islands Bureau of Internal Revenue [the “VIBIR”] has opposed the motion and filed a cross motion for summary judgment. The Court heard argument on the Lansdales’ motion and took the matter under advisement. For the reasons set forth below, the Court will deny the Lansdales’ motion. Consideration of the VIBIR’s cross motion for summary judgment has been suspended pending this decision.

I. FACTS

This case is a continuation in the VI-BIR’s…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Brown v. FelsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. United States v. RodgersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Marine Midland Bank, N.A. v. James W. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Kelvin Manbodh Asbestos Litigation Series v. Hess Oil Virgin Islands Corp.Superior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2005
  2. Government of the United States Virgin Islands v. Takata Corp.Superior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2017
  3. Sarauw v. FawkesSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2017
  4. Bluebeard's Castle, Inc. v. HodgeDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 2009
  5. Kelvin Manbodh Asbestos Litigation Series v. Hess Oil Virgin Islands Corp.Superior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2006

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API