Jacobson v. City of Milwaukee
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.
In our opinion, the trial court was correct in concluding that the verdict was not supported by the evidence.
The record is replete with instances showing the uncertainty and confusion in the mind of the plaintiff. Several such instances are referred to in the statement of facts given above.
In the first place, she was not at all certain where it was that she fell. When she related the occurrence to the police officer immediately after the fall, she said that she slipped on the icy sidewalk, and we are inclined to believe, as the trial court did, that the proximate cause of her injuries was the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Slam v. Lake Superior Terminal & Transfer Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
- McCormick v. City of RacineWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
- Wear v. Northern States Power Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
- Wanta v. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
- Nitka v. Van CampWisconsin Supreme Court · 1949
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Stippich v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Scalzo v. MarshWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
- Capitol Sand & Gravel Co. v. WaffenschmidtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
- Johnson v. AgerbeckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
- Pearson v. Boise CityIdaho Supreme Court · 1959