Stippich v. City of Milwaukee
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHallows, J.
The city grounded its defense solely upon the proposition its liability is limited by sec. 81.15, Stats., 1 to an insufficiency or want of repair in the sidewalk existing for a period of three weeks and a mere slippery condition resulting from a natural accumulation of snow and ice in winter, in the absence of an underlying defect which would otherwise be actionable, did not satisfy the statute. Prior to our decision in Holytz v. Milwaukee (1962), 17 Wis. (2d) 26, 115 N. W. (2d) 618, which abolished governmental immunity for torts, the dismissal of this case would probably have been affirmed.…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Holytz v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
- Hyer v. City of JanesvilleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
- Cook v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1869
- Reed v. City of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1892
- Walley v. PatakeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Quinlivan v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1975
- Walker v. BignellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
- Raisanen v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Sambs v. City of BrookfieldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
- Schwartz v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.