Johnson v. Agerbeck
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Nelson, Justice.
This is an appeal from an order denying defendants’ motion for amended findings or for a new trial. The court below found plaintiffs entitled to a permanent injunction and thereby entitled to a mandatory injunction of the court compelling defendants to forthwith fill up a ditch on their land and on the adjacent public right-of-way. The matter was submitted to the court on all issues.
The questions involved in the main are whether the evidence sustains a finding that defendants unreasonably caused surface waters to flow in increased volume onto the plaintiffs’ land contrary to…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Sheehan v. FlynnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
- Enderson v. KelehanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
- S. H. Kress & Co. v. SharpMississippi Supreme Court · 1930
- Moore v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1911
- State v. WagnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Kallevig v. HolmgrenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
- Evers v. WillabyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
- Bymark v. EnglertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
- Argyelan v. HavilandIndiana Supreme Court · 1982
- Argyelan v. HavilandIndiana Supreme Court · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.