Legal Opinion

Capitol Sand & Gravel Co. v. Waffenschmidt

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 1976No. 68 (1974)PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobert W. Hansen, J.

The parties to this action have gone to court twice over a single pile of gravel. In the first of the two cases, the landowner established that the gravel company had gone beyond the intent and agreement of the parties in storing gravel from another pit on the landowner’s property, and was awarded damages. In this second action, here on appeal, the gravel company was awarded judgment on findings that: (1) The gravel company was entitled to possession of the gravel stockpile; (2) the stockpile was wrongfully detained by the landowner; and (3) the value of the stockpile was $6,800.

As to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Zimmer v. DaunWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Powalka v. State Mutual Life Assurance Co. of AmericaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Van Valkenburgh v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1878
  4. McConnell v. L. C. L. Transit Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Pautz v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Krueger Ex Rel. Lee v. Tappan Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1981
  2. Consolidated Papers, Inc. v. Department of IndustryWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Carl v. Spickler Enterprises, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1991
  4. Richard A. Mueller v. TL90108, LLCWisconsin Supreme Court · 2020
  5. Mueller v. TL90108, LLCCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2018

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API