Nitka v. Van Camp

The issue in this case is whether there is any evidence sufficient to create a jury issue as to whether the defendant, Fabian Van Camp, was negligent in any respect in the operation of his automobile, and if there is evidence of such negligence, whether there is any causal connection between such negligence and the accident that occurred.

The points to be considered in reviewing a directed verdict were clearly set out in Slam v. Lake Superior T. & T. R. Co. (1913), 152 Wis. 426, 432, 433, 435, 140 N. W. 30:

“It is considered that these cases and perhaps others containing like language were all…