Legal Opinion

Scalzo v. Marsh

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 7, 1961PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurrie, J.

The issues on this appeal are:(1) Should either or both of the jury’s answers of “No” to the first two questions of the special verdict have been changed to “Yes” by the trial court?(2) Did the trial court commit prejudicial error in instructing the jury?(3) Should a new trial be granted in order to have determined the issue of whether “continued servicing” of the gas system constituted a violation of the liquefied petroleum gases code ?(4) Should a new trial be granted in the interest of justice ?(5) Was it error to have granted the directed verdict in favor of Skelly Oil Company?

Changing of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wells v. Dairyland Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Nimits v. Motor Transport Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Conrardy v. Sheboygan CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Lind v. LundWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Winner v. BaumanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1871

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Martin v. Outboard Marine Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Hendrix v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1969
  3. Bowman v. KaufmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
  4. Resseguie v. American Mutual Liability InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Dascenzo v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API