Ahrens v. Anderson
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSteinert, J.
This is an action for damages for personal injuries sustained by a pedestrian who was struck by an automobile. Trial by a jury resulted in a verdict for defendant. From an order granting plaintiffs’ motion for new trial, the defendant has appealed.
There are three assignments of error: (1) that the court erred in overruling appellant’s challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence at the close of respondents’ case; (2) that the court erred in refusing to grant appellant’s motion to dismiss the case at the conclusion of all the testimony given at the trial; and (3) that the court erred in…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Olsen v. Peerless LaundryWashington Supreme Court · 1920
- Norland v. PetersonWashington Supreme Court · 1932
- Huntington v. Clallam Grain Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1933
- Bell v. Northwest Cities Gas Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1931
- Davis v. RiegelWashington Supreme Court · 1935
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Beck v. DyeWashington Supreme Court · 1939
- State v. McDanielsWashington Supreme Court · 1948
- Estill v. BerryWashington Supreme Court · 1937
- Lindberg v. SteeleWashington Supreme Court · 1940
- Mathisen v. NortonWashington Supreme Court · 1936
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.