Legal Opinion

Estill v. Berry

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 27, 1937No. 26646. Department TwoPublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeals, J.

Boren avenue in the city of Seattle runs approximately north and south, and crosses Olive way at right angles. At about a quarter after five o’clock in the afternoon of December 24, 1934, Celia Estill, one of the plaintiffs in this action (who will hereinafter be referred to as though she were the sole party plaintiff), left the President Apartment Hotel, which is located on the south side of Olive way, half a block east of Boren avenue, and, with her friend, Miss Harriet Wilson, walked to a cafe, also located on the south side of Olive way, half a block to the west of Boren avenue.

Having…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Dando v. BrobstSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  2. Provinsal v. PetersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
  3. Ahrens v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Hamblet v. SoderburgWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Bailey v. ForeSupreme Court of Virginia · 1934

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Beck v. DyeWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Wright v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1941
  3. In Re the Eligibility for Unemployment Benefits of FoyWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Johnston v. VukelicWyoming Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Chaffee v. ChaffeeWashington Supreme Court · 1943

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API