Legal Opinion

Davis v. Riegel

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 6, 1935No. 25324. Department OnePublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Main, J. —

The plaintiff brought this action to recover damages for personal injuries which she sustained when hit by an automobile. The cause was tried to the court and a jury, and resulted in a verdict in favor of the plaintiff in the sum of $2,165. The defendants moved for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and for a new trial, both of which motions were sustained. From the judgment entered disposing of both motions as indicated, the plaintiff appeals.

The respondents Dee R. Riegel and Guy E. Riegel are copartners engaged in the business of selling new and second-hand automobiles in the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Silverstein v. AdamsWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Brammer v. LappenbuschWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Olsen v. Peerless LaundryWashington Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Morehouse v. City of EverettWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Morris v. Seattle, Renton & Southern Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Coppo v. Van WieringenWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Corbaley v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Delsman v. BertottiWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Farrow v. OstromWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Carmin v. Port of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1941

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API