Legal Opinion
Siporen v. City of Medford
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided November 18, 2010No. LUBA 2008185; CA A142541; SC S058025PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGillette, J.
The subject of this land use case is a decision by the Medford City Council approving a “site plan and architectural review” application for a large store that Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., proposes to build within the city’s boundaries. Certain individual citizens of Medford and a citizens’ group, Medford Citizens for Responsible Development (collectively, petitioners) appealed the city’s decision to the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA), arguing that Wal-Mart’s application did not comply with certain provisions of the Medford Land Development Code (MLDC), which (in petitioners’ view) required…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Clark v. Jackson CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- Anderson v. PedenOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Gage v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- Friends of Columbia Gorge, Inc. v. Columbia River Gorge CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Setniker v. Polk CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
- Gould v. Deschutes CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- Mark Latham Excavation, Inc. v. Deschutes CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
- Johnson v. Landwatch Lane CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
- Siegert v. Crook CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.