Nay v. Department of Human Services
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBaldwin, J.
The decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed in part and vacated in part. The rule amendments to OAR 461-135-0832(10)(b)(B)(viii) (2010) and OAR 461-135-0835 (l)(e)(B)(iii) (2010) are held invalid.
BALDWIN, J.
In general, the Department of Human Services is required by law to recover Medicaid payments from those assets in which the Medicaid recipient had an interest at the time of death. In 2008, the department amended its administrative rules regarding the scope of that recovery. The amended rules allow the department to recover the payments from assets that the recipient had transferred…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Harris v. McRaeSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Planned Parenthood Ass'n v. Department of Human ResourcesOregon Supreme Court · 1984
- In Re Marriage of KunzeOregon Supreme Court · 2004
- Matter of Marriage of EngleOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- Friends of Columbia Gorge, Inc. v. Columbia River Gorge CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 2009
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Timothy Barnes v. Chase Home Finance, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Pulito v. Board of NursingOregon Supreme Court · 2020
- Adamson v. Or. Health Auth.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
- Sarepta Therapeutics v. Oregon Health AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
- Walter v. Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.