Legal Opinion

Croly v. Board of Trustees of the City of Sacramento

California Supreme Court

Decided December 13, 1897No. Sac. No. 239PublishedCited by 13 opinions

APPEAL .from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sacramento County. A. P. Gatlin, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

A citizen of the city of Sacramento presented in writing to the board of trustees certain charges against appellant, as superintendent of streets; whereupon the hoard fixed a time for the hearing thereof, and caused a copy of the charges and a notice of the time fixed for the hearing to be served upon appellant, who thereupon petitioned the superior court for a writ prohibiting said board from proceeding to try him upon said charges. An alternative writ was granted, with an order to show cause why it should not be made absolute. The board demurred to the petition, and upon the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Richards v. ClarksburgWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1887

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Coffey v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Dierssen v. Civil Service CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  3. Good v. Common CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
  4. Nider v. City CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  5. Scheafer v. HermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API