Legal Opinion

Harnett v. County of Sacramento

California Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1925No. Docket No. Sac. 3651PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLennon, J.

Defendants appeal from a judgment enjoining and restraining them from submitting to the electors of the county of Sacramento a measure proposed by initiative petition under the provisions of article IV, section 1 of the constitution of the state of California. The purpose of the measure is to change the boundaries of three of the five supervisorial districts of the county of Sacramento, leaving the remaining two districts as they now stand.

Judgment was rendered upon the pleadings. From the complaint it appears that the population of Sacramento County is distributed among the five proposed…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Coulter v. PoolCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  2. State ex rel. Barrett v. HitchcockSupreme Court of Missouri · 1912
  3. State ex rel. Sullivan v. SchnitgerWyoming Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Felt v. WaughopCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Scheafer v. HermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Johnston v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. American Federation of Labor-Congress of Industrial Organizations v. EuCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Sundance v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  4. DeBottari v. City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  5. City of Ceres v. City of ModestoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API