Legal Opinion
Littlefield v. State, Department of Human Services
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided July 2, 1984PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DUFRESNE, Active Retired Justice.
Elizabeth Littlefield, an AFDC recipient, pursuant to Rule 80C(m), M.R.Civ.P., seeks in this appeal a review of the judgment of the Superior Court (Waldo County) affirming rulings of the Department of Human Services terminating for the period of 37 months her monthly benefits of three hundred thirty-two ($332.00) dollars for herself and a minor daughter under the Aid to Families with Dependent Children program. Because the Department of Human Services (DHS) in its application of the lump sum rule so-called in a manner inconsistent with its own regulations…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Chapman v. Houston Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- King v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Shea v. VialpandoSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Graziani v. Committee on Legal EthicsSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Miller v. YouakimSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Hall v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Hornstein v. BarryDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
- Anderson v. Commissioner of the Department of Human ServicesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985
- In Re Agent Orange Product Liability LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1985
- Gale Coker v. Dr. Louis W. Sullivan, Secretary, U.S. Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.