Legal Opinion
Hall v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided June 22, 2004No. 40 EAP 2002PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ANNOUNCING THE JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
Justice NEWMAN.
Bryan P. Hall (Hall) appeals from an Order of the Commonwealth Court, which dismissed his pro se Petition for Review in the Nature of Mandamus, brought in the original jurisdiction of the Commonwealth Court. Hall contends that the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole (Board) improperly denied his numerous requests for parole by judging his applications pursuant to standards enacted in 1996, five years after his date of sentence. For the reasons discussed herein, we affirm the Order of the Commonwealth Court.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Johnson v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Hill v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- California Department of Corrections v. MoralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Commonwealth v. CarsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Shawn Parker v. Donald Kelchner, Superintendent Attorney General of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
- Commonwealth v. CoxSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Stone Crushed Partnership v. Kassab Archbold Jackson & O'BrienSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Better Building Maintenance of the Virgin Islands, Inc. v. LeeSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2014
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.