Legal Opinion
Palladine v. Imperial Valley Farm Lands Assn.
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 23, 1924No. Civ. No. 4421PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFinlayson, P. J.
This is an action to recover damages for fraudulent representations made in the sale of a section of land in the Imperial Valley, hereafter referred to as section 13. The case was tried before a jury. A judgment of nonsuit was entered in favor of the defendant Janss Investment Company. A verdict in the sum of twenty-five thousand dollars was returned against the defendants Imperial Valley Farm Lands Association and H. H. Clark, both of whom have appealed from the judgment.
The following outline of some of the principal facts will suffice for an understanding of the points to be discussed: The…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Bridger v. . GoldsmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
- The Edward Barron Estate Co. v. the Woodruff Co.California Supreme Court · 1912
- Hines v. BrodeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- French v. FreemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Couts v. WinstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Gagne v. BertranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Vai v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- People v. La MacChiaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Paolini v. SulprizioCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Merchants Trust Co. v. HopkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.