Legal Opinion

Maryland Casualty Co. v. Little

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 27, 1929No. Docket No. 43PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.

Respondent instituted this action against defendants to recover judgment upon a promissory note dated August 6, 1923, given by Leroy Little, and signed by him “Leroy Little Wo,” by the terms of which the maker promised to pay respondent $2,412.13, with interest at six per cent per annum, together with attorney’s fees in the sum of ten per cent of the principal and accrued interest, in case suit was instituted to collect such note. A second cause of action was abandoned by respondent at the time of trial. Judgment was rendered in favor of respondent for the principal sum of the note only, as…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Savings & Loan Society v. BurnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Maupin v. SolomonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  3. Shunken v. CohenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Ross v. CornellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
  5. Wilson v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Middleton v. NewportCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Griffeth v. FehselCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  3. Aetna Casualty and Surety Company v. WoffordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
  4. Fisher v. FisherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. Fooshe v. SunshineCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API