Aetna Casualty and Surety Company v. Wofford
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAMS; Vice Chief Justice.
This is an action on a promissory note by The Aetna Casualty and Surety Co., hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, against several defendants, hereinafter more particularly identified. The trial court sustained a demurrer to plaintiff’s evidence and plaintiff appeals. The only question presented by the appeal is the correctness of the trial court’s action in sustaining the demurrer to the evidence.
Prior to December 1, 1949, Wofford, Nicholson and Rose Drilling Company was a partnership composed of James R.. Cas-sedy, Charles W. Dyer, Ralph W. Gordon, Troy G.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Haupt v. VintWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1911
- Mendenhall v. StewartIndiana Court of Appeals · 1897
- McConnell v. HoldermanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Peoples Bank of Pratt, Ks. v. Frick Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1903
- Moore v. DiehmSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Yellow Cab Company v. AllenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
- Douglas Reservoirs Water Users Ass'n v. Maurer & GarstWyoming Supreme Court · 1965
- Lenz v. YoungSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
- Carter v. LoveSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
- Luker v. KellsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.