Hako Minuteman, Inc. v. Advance Machine Co.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ROVNER, District Judge.
This is a patent infringement action. On December 22, 1989, defendant moved for dismissal or transfer, arguing that venue was improper and that, even if venue is proper, transfer is warranted for the convenience of witnesses and the interests of justice. On January 5, 1990, plaintiff submitted a “preliminary response,” arguing that defendant’s motion was premised on inapplicable legal principles. Plaintiff requested an opportunity to conduct discovery and address the motion in more depth if the Court ultimately disagreed with plaintiff's…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In Re Cordis CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Knapp-Monarch Co. v. Casco Products Corp. And E.A. Langenfeld Associates, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1965
- Knapp-Monarch Company v. Dominion Electric Corporation and Steinmetz & Kelly, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1966
- Mid-Continent Metal Products Co. v. Maxon Premix Burner Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1966
- A. O. Smith-Inland, Inc. v. Hoeganaes Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1976
3Cited by1 opinion
- Motorola Solutions, Inc. v. Hytera Communications Corporation Ltd.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2019