Legal Opinion
In Re Cordis Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided July 10, 1985No. 20-1089PublishedCited by 114 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Before MARKEY, Chief Judge, FRIEDMAN, and RICH, Circuit Judges. FRIEDMAN, Circuit Judge.
Cordis Corporation (Cordis) has petitioned for a writ of mandamus ordering the United States District Court, District of Minnesota, to dismiss the present action for improper venue. We deny the petition.
I
On February 10, 1984, Medtronic, Inc. (Medtronic), a Minnesota corporation with its principal place of business in Minneapolis, Minnesota, filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the district of Minnesota against Cordis alleging patent infringement with respect to four patents owned…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- De Beers Consolidated Mines, Ltd. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Bankers Life & Casualty Co. v. HollandSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Fourco Glass Co. v. Transmirra Products Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Schnell v. Peter Eckrich & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by114 opinions
- Ve Holding Corporation v. Johnson Gas Appliance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- In Re: Cray Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- In Re GOOGLE LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020
- Hsin Ten Enterprise USA, Inc. v. Clark EnterprisesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Regenlab U.S. LLC v. Estar Techs. Ltd.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
109 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.