Legal Opinion
Knapp-Monarch Co. v. Casco Products Corp. And E.A. Langenfeld Associates, Ltd.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided March 23, 1965No. 14788PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SWYGERT, Circuit Judge.
This is an action for patent infringement brought by plaintiff Knapp-Monarch Company against defendants Casco Products Corporation and E. A. Langen-feld Associates, Ltd. Casco moved to dismiss the complaint for lack of proper venue, and the district court granted the motion. Langenfeld moved to dismiss the complaint on the ground that it had not infringed. The district court treated Langenfeld’s motion as one for summary judgment and dismissed the complaint on the basis of de minimis. Plaintiff has appealed from the orders of dismissal. A summary of the facts follows.
Cas…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Fourco Glass Co. v. Transmirra Products Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Schnell v. Peter Eckrich & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- W. S. Tyler Co. v. Ludlow-Saylor Wire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Fromberg, Inc. v. Jack W. ThornhillCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
- Minnesota Mining & Mfg. Co. v. International Plastic Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1947
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- In Re: Cray Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- Ling-Temco-Vought, Inc. v. Kollsman Instrument CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
- Rengo Co. Ltd. And Simon Container MacHinery Limited, in No. 80-2556 v. Molins MacHine Company, Inc., in No. 80-2557Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- Grantham v. Challenge-Cook Bros.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1969
- Intermedics, Inc. v. Ventritex, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1991
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.