Legal Opinion

Knapp-Monarch Company v. Dominion Electric Corporation and Steinmetz & Kelly, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided July 20, 1966No. 15411PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SWYGERT, Circuit Judge.

This appeal presents for our consideration a situation which in many respects is similar to that presented in Knapp-Monarch Co. v. Casco Products Corp., 342 F.2d 622 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 828, 86 S.Ct. 64, 15 L.Ed.2d 73 (1965), in which we affirmed the dismissal of a suit for patent infringement against a manufacturer for lack of proper venue under 28 U.S.C. § 1400(b) and held that a manufacturer’s representative’s infringement was de minimis.

Knapp-Monarch Company is the owner of United States Letters Patent No. 3,-038,269 for a steam and spray iron. It…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Knapp-Monarch Co. v. Casco Products Corp. And E.A. Langenfeld Associates, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1965

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. David Neifeld v. Meyer Steinberg. David Neifeld v. Meyer SteinbergCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
  2. Grantham v. Challenge-Cook Bros.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1969
  3. Bayou Steel Corp. v. M/V AmstelvoornCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
  4. Dual Manufacturing and Engineering, Inc. And the Berkline Corporation v. Burris Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
  5. Lomanco, Inc. v. Missouri Pacific RailroadDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1983

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API