Legal Opinion

A. O. Smith-Inland, Inc. v. Hoeganaes Corp.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided January 12, 1976No. 74 C 1919PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION

MARSHALL, District Judge.

The plaintiff, A. O. Smith-Inland, Inc., filed the present action against the defendant, Hoeganaes Corporation, alleg*540ing numerous and continuing acts of patent infringement involving metal powders. Jurisdiction is predicated on 28 U.S.C. § 1338(a) (1970). The defendant has moved to dismiss the complaint for improper venue. Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(3).

Venue in an action for patent infringement is governed exclusively by 28 U.S.C. § 1400(b) and is not modified by the general venue provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1391 (1970). Fourco Glass Co. v. Transmirra…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Cannon Manufacturing Co. v. Cudahy Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Fourco Glass Co. v. Transmirra Products Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Brunette MacHine Works, Ltd. v. Kockum Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Knapp-Monarch Co. v. Casco Products Corp. And E.A. Langenfeld Associates, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1965
  5. Grantham v. Challenge-Cook Bros.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1969

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hako Minuteman, Inc. v. Advance Machine Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API