Legal Opinion
Mid-Continent Metal Products Co. v. Maxon Premix Burner Company, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided October 25, 1966No. 15617PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HASTINGS, Chief Judge.
Mid-Continent Metal Products Co. has appealed from a judgment of the district court dismissing, for want of venue, its amended complaint charging Maxon Premix Burner Company, Inc., with infringement of its United States Letters Patent No. 3,186,697, issued June 1,1965 and entitled “Gas Fired Heater”.
The affidavit of Lowell F. Crouse, a vice-president of Maxon, Maxon’s answers to interrogatories and the deposition of Roy Sundling, manager of Max-on Premix Burner Sales and Service, disclose that Maxon is an Indiana corporation having its principal place of business and all…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Fourco Glass Co. v. Transmirra Products Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Schnell v. Peter Eckrich & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Union Asbestos & Rubber Company, by Change of Name Unarco Industries, Inc. v. Evans Products CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1964
3Cited by11 opinions
- Dual Manufacturing and Engineering, Inc. And the Berkline Corporation v. Burris Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
- Coulter Electronics, Inc., an Illinois Corporation v. A. B. Lars Ljungberg & Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1967
- Joslyn Manufacturing Co. v. Amerace Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1990
- Penntube Plastics Company v. Fluorotex, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1971
- Hydro-Clear Corp. v. Aer-O-Flo Corp.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1970
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.