Johnson v. De Waard
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
WARD, J., pro tem.
Defendants de Waard & Sons, bonded by the Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, contracted with the Los Angeles County Flood Control District to construct the Altadena storm drain. A part of this improvement consisted in excavating and concreting a tunnel, together with some work to be performed upon a drift or incline.
De Waard & Sons entered into an oral agreement, which was subsequently reduced to writing, whereby they subcontracted to the plaintiffs the excavating work at $8 per lineal foot, and the timbering at $5 per 1,000 b. m. feet of lumber put in place for…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Antonelle v. Kennedy & Shaw Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
- Otten v. SpreckelsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
- Gillin v. HopkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
- Bailey v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bastanchury v. Times-Mirror Co.California Court of Appeal · 1945
- Peter Kiewit Sons' Co. v. Summit Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969
- Panno v. RussoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Cooley v. FrankWyoming Supreme Court · 1951
- Wolf v. PriceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.