Wolf v. Price
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtRoth, P. J.
This is an appeal from a summary judgment in favor of respondents. The only issue is whether there are any triable issues of fact.
Appellants, husband and wife, filed their action for breach of a contract by respondents to purchase certain property on Vermont Avenue in Los Angeles. The contract is evidenced by escrow instructions entered into by appellants and the respondent Price as the nominal purchaser. The other respondents were Price’s nominees. All respondents answered. The respondents Oscar Topper, Irwin Topper and Harry Groman, partners in the respondent Vermont-Browning Company, here…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Desny v. WilderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Walsh v. WalshCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- King v. StanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Litvinuk v. LitvinukCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Arnold v. American Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1906
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Holland v. LawlessNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1981
- Harben v. HuttonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1987
- Gaggero v. YuraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Goodman v. Community Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Leiter v. EltingeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.