Legal Opinion

Hale v. City of Columbus

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 28, 1990No. Case 89AP-1365PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYoung, J.

This matter is before this court upon the appeal of Richard Hale et al., appellants, from a judgment rendered in favor of appellee, City of Columbus, Ohio ("city"). On May 22, 1989, the Columbus City Council enacted Ordinance No. 1226-89 ("the ordinance") which, among other things, banned the possession and sale of "assault weapons " and "large capacity magazines, " and required the registration and licensing of assault weapons currently in possession. The ordinance amended Columbus City Code ("C.C") Section 2323.01 and enacted C.C. Sections 2313.05 and 2323.06 affecting firearm possession.

On…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Cochran v. Van SurlayNew York Supreme Court · 1838
  2. City of Dayton v. S. S. Kresge Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Ohio Public Interest Action Group, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Grant v. CourterNew York Supreme Court · 1857
  5. Mosher v. City of DaytonOhio Supreme Court · 1976

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Arnold v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Stevens v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Ross v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. City of Cleveland v. CarpenterCity of Cleveland Municipal Court · 2003
  5. State v. Grays, Unpublished Decision (12-18-2003)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API