Legal Opinion

City of Dayton v. S. S. Kresge Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 1926No. 19374PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMatthias, J.

The only question presented in this case is whether a municipal corporation may, by ordinance, prohibit mercantile establishments from using double-acting exit doors, and require the exit doors of such establishments to be so constructed and installed as to swing outward only. The ordinance of the city of Dayton having reference to the exit doors of mercantile establishments required that such doors should swing outward and toward the open or natural means of egress, and prohibited rolling, double-acting, sliding, and revolving doors as a means of egress from such establishments. The remedy…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Thomas Cusack Co. v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1917

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Portage County Board of Commissioners v. City of AkronOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Direct Plumbing Supply Co. v. City of DaytonOhio Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Goldberg Companies, Inc. v. Council of the City of Richmond HeightsOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Hilton v. City of ToledoOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  5. State v. Renalist, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API