Legal Opinion

Mosher v. City of Dayton

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1976No. 76-171PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStern, J.

Appellants contend (1) that the ordinance in question infringes upon the right of the people to bear arms and, therefore, violates Section 4, Article I2 of the *247Ohio Constitution, and (2) violates the Second Amendment3 to the United States Constitution. We disagree with appellants’ contentions.

The ordinance does not deprive any individual of the protection of Section 4, Article I of the Ohio Constitution. All that the ordinance requires is that the person seeking to possess a handgun he identified under the provisions of the ordinance. In State v. Neito (1920), 101 Ohio St. 409, 130 N. E. 663,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Presser v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. BURTON v. SillsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1968

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Arnold v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Parker v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
  3. State v. TaniguchiOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Posey v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2006
  5. City of University Heights v. O'LearyOhio Supreme Court · 1981

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API