Ohio Public Interest Action Group, Inc. v. Public Utilities Commission

The first three of appellant’s propositions of law are directed to the applicability of Section 9 of Amended Substitute House Bill 206 to the proceedings being conducted by the Public Utilities Commission, pursuant to appellant’s complaint.

I

Appellant’s initial contention is that Section 9 cannot affect the proceedings or the commission’s investigation because Section 9 “contains a savings clause which saves and makes the law under which these cases have been initiated still applicable.” The “savings clause” referred to by appellant is the language of the statute which excepts from its terms…