Legal Opinion
State v. Grays, Unpublished Decision (12-18-2003)
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided December 18, 2003No. 82410UnpublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION
{¶ 1} Appellant the State of Ohio appeals from the trial court's finding Cleveland Cod. Ord. 601.15 unconstitutional. The State assigns the following error for our review:
{¶ 2} "I. The trial court erred by concluding that City of Cleveland Ordinance 601.15 is unconstitutional under the three-part test established in New York v. Burger (1987), 482 U.S. 691, 699, 107 S.Ct. 2636, 2642, 96 L.Ed.2d 601."
{¶ 3} After reviewing the pertinent law, we reverse the trial court's judgment and remand for further proceedings. The apposite facts follow.
{¶ 4} Grays was indicted by the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Marshall v. Barlow's, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- New York v. BurgerSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. BiswellSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Colonnade Catering Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Donovan v. DeweySupreme Court of the United States · 1981
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Cleveland v. Shaker Hts. Apts. Owner, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2026