Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Ruessman v. Flanagan

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 11, 1992No. 92-1312PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Per curiam

For a writ of prohibition to issue, a relator must establish (1) that the court or officer against whom the writ is sought is about to exercise judicial or quasi-judicial power, (2) that the exercise of that power is unauthorized by law, and (3) that denying the writ will result in injury for which no other adequate remedy exists in the ordinary course of law. State ex rel. Tollis v. Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga Cty. (1988), 40 Ohio St.3d 145, 147, 532 N.E.2d 727, 729. There is no dispute that respondents are about to exercise judicial power. Rather, relator contends that the exercise of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. O'Brien v. University Community Tenants Union, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1975
  2. State ex rel. Adams v. GusweilerOhio Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Schucker v. MetcalfOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  4. State Ex Rel. Miller v. Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 1949
  5. State ex rel. Natalina Food Co. v. Ohio Civil Rights CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1990

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Goldstein v. ChristiansenOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State ex rel. Keenan v. CalabreseOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State ex rel. Levin v. City of Sheffield LakeOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State ex rel. Dannaher v. CrawfordOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State ex rel. Koren v. GroganOhio Supreme Court · 1994

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API