State ex rel. Youngstown v. Mahoning County Board of Elections
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
Initially, relators have filed a memorandum in opposition to John R. Swierz’s amicus brief. Swierz is one of the candidates who has filed a petition to run for city council. Although we denied Swierz’s motion to intervene because of his failure to comply with Civ.R. 24(C), his amicus brief requires no leave of court. See S.Ct.Prae.R. VI(5) and X(8). Accordingly, Swierz’s brief was properly filed, and it is considered in our determination of the merits.
As to relators’ mandamus claim, as respondents note, where a petition filed in this court or a court of appeals is purportedly in mandamus, but…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Van Fossen v. Babcock & Wilcox Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
- Goldstein v. ChristiansenOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- Nease v. Medical College HospitalsOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- State ex rel. Paluf v. FeneliOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- State ex rel. Semik v. Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1993
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- State ex rel. Polo v. Cuyahoga County BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- State ex rel. Grendell v. DavidsonOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- State ex rel. Thurn v. Cuyahoga County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- Whitman v. Hamilton County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- Whitman v. Hamilton Cty. Bd. of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 2002
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.