Legal Opinion

Prime Fur Corp. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided September 5, 1956No. C. D. 1802PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WilsoN, Judge:

This case has been submitted to the court for decision upon the following stipulation, signed by the respective parties:

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the attorneys for the parties hereto that the merchandise covered by the above enumerated protests consists of fur plates composed of the ears or legs of lamb skins or the heads or legs of kid skins, it being agreed that the plates are composed either of all ears, all legs or all heads and that pieces of lamb skins are not commingled with pieces of kid skins in the same plate.

That the plates consisting of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kung Chen Fur Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952
  2. A. S. Gold & Bro., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954
  3. United States v. RichterCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  4. Carlowitz v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  5. Kung Chen Fur Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1950

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Joseph Rotberg & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
  2. Alfin Trading Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
  3. Brenner Bros. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
  4. Brenner Bros. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
  5. Brimberg Bros. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API