Legal Opinion

Kung Chen Fur Corp. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided January 13, 1950No. C. D. 1203PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OliveR, Chief Judge:

The merchandise before us consists of kidskin plates exported from China and entered at the port of New York. They were classified at 25 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 1519 (a), Tariff Act of 1930, as “* * * plates * * * of dressed * * * kid skins” and are claimed to be free of duty under the provisions of paragraph 1681, covering “Furs and fur skins, not specially provided for, undressed.” Defendant alternatively contends that these plates, if not dutiable under paragraph 1519 (a), are properly dutiable at 20 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 1558 as…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Draeger Shipping Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kung Chen Fur Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952
  2. A. S. Gold & Bro., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954
  3. Prime Fur Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956
  4. Joseph Rotberg & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
  5. Atlas Trading Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1955

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API