Legal Opinion

United States v. Richter

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 31, 1911No. 544PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, G. A. 7122 (T. D. 31043).

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, Judge

The collector of customs at the port of New York classified certain dressed sheepskins, sewed into rectangular shapes, 64 inches long by *16830 inches wide, as manufactures of fur, and assessed them for duty at 35 per cent ad valorem under paragraph 439 of the tariff act of August 5, 1909, which reads as follows:

439. Furs dressed on the skin, not advanced further than dyeing, but not repaired, twenty per centum ad valorem; manufactures of furs, further advanced than dressing and dyeing, when prepared for use as material, including plates, linings, and crosses, thirty-five per centum ad valorem;…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hartranft v. WiegmannSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Tide Water Oil Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  3. Dejonge v. MagoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1895

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Prime Fur Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956
  2. United States v. Gibson-Thomsen Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1940
  3. Tilge v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
  4. Ball v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1917
  5. Kleinberger v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API