Legal Opinion

Kung Chen Fur Corp. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided December 1, 1952No. C. D. 1480PublishedCited by 136 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Oliver, Chief Judge:

This case concerns the classification of ldd-skin plates exported from China and entered at the port of New York, *267Tbe merchandise was classified as plates of dressed kidskins, and assessed with duty either at 25 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 1519 (a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as originally enacted, or at 12% per centum ad valorem under said paragraph, as modified by the trade agreement with Argentina, T. D. 50504.

Plaintiff claims that the merchandise is free of duty under paragraph 1681 of the Tariff Act of 1930, which provides for “Furs and fur skins, not…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kung Chen Fur Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1950

3Cited by136 opinions

  1. A. S. Gold & Bro., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954
  2. Prime Fur Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956
  3. Joseph Rotberg & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
  4. Atlas Trading Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1955
  5. Modlin v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953

131 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API