Legal Opinion

Brenner Bros. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided January 7, 1958No. 61437; protests 243930-K, etc. (New York)Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items marked “K” consist of kidskin plates the same in all material respeets as those the subject of Kung Chen Fur Corpn. v. United States (29 Cust. Ct. 266, C. D. 1480) or Prime Fur Corp. v. United States (37 Cust. Ct. 83, C. D. 1802) and the items marked “L” of lambskin plates similar to those the subject of A. S. Gold & Bro., Inc. v. United States (33 Cust. Ct. 120, C. D. 1643) or C. D. 1802, supra, the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.

Mollison, J., dissented for the reasons set forth in his…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kung Chen Fur Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952
  2. A. S. Gold & Bro., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954
  3. Prime Fur Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API