Legal Opinion

Brimberg Bros. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided May 20, 1958No. 61957; protests 742424-G, etc. (New York)Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of kidskin plates the same in all material respects as those the subject of Kung Chen Fur Corpn. v. United States (29 Cust. Ct. 266, C. D. 1480) or Prime Fur Corp. v. United States (37 Cust. Ct. 83, C. D. 1802) and lambskin plates similar to those the subject of A. S. Gold & Bro., Inc. v. United States (33 Cust. Ct. 120, C. D. 1643) or C. D. 1802, supra, the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kung Chen Fur Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952
  2. A. S. Gold & Bro., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954
  3. Prime Fur Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956