Legal Opinion
Moore v. Calavar Corp.
District Court, W.D. Louisiana
Decided April 14, 1992No. Civ. A. No. 89-2819PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING RE MOTION TO COMPEL
TYNES, United States Magistrate Judge.
Now pending before the Court is the Motion of Calavar Corporation (“Calavar”) to Compel a Second Independent Medical Examination of the plaintiff by Dr. James C. McDaniel. Plaintiff objects to a second examination on two grounds, including (1) the first examination by Dr. McDaniel occurred only nine months ago on June 12, 1991; and (2) there has been no change in the plaintiffs physical complaints since June 12, 1991.
Rule 35(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires that a moving party show “good cause” and that the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Schlagenhauf v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Enyart v. Santa Fe Trail Transp. Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1951
- Teche Lines, Inc. v. BoyetteCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1940
- Robert L. Schlagenhauf v. Cale J. Holder, United States District Judge for the Southern District of IndianaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1963
- Vopelak v. WilliamsDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1967
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- John P. Miksis v. Henry L. Howard and Schneider National Carriers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- Ornelas v. Southern Tire Mart, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2013
- Shirsat v. Mutual Pharmaceutical Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
- Peters v. NelsonDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1994
- Ziemann v. Burlington County Bridge CommissionDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1994
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.