Legal Opinion
Vopelak v. Williams
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided August 4, 1967No. C 67-8PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
RE MOTION FOR PHYSICAL EXAMINATION
DON J. YOUNG, District Judge.
Defendants have moved for an order requiring the plaintiff Irene Vopelak to submit to a physical examination by a doctor and a dentist of this city. Plaintiffs object, contending that this plaintiff was examined by a doctor and a dentist in New York City at the request of defendants’ insurance carrier some three months after the occurrence of the accident.
It is the plaintiffs’ position that Rule 35(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which provides that the court may order physical examinations for good cause…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Schlagenhauf v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Enyart v. Santa Fe Trail Transp. Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1951
- Bowing v. Delaware Rayon Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1937
- John Benning v. Richard L. PhelpsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
- Robert L. Schlagenhauf v. Cale J. Holder, United States District Judge for the Southern District of IndianaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1963
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- John P. Miksis v. Henry L. Howard and Schneider National Carriers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- Hildyard v. Western Fasteners, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1974
- Peters v. NelsonDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1994
- Moore v. Calavar Corp.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1992
- Sadler v. AckerDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2009
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.