Legal Opinion

Robert L. Schlagenhauf v. Cale J. Holder, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Indiana

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided July 23, 1963No. 14103_1PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SWYGERT, Circuit Judge.

Robert L. Schlagenhauf petitions for a writ of mandamus (28 U.S.C. § 1651(a), the All Writs Act) directed to the Honorable Cale J. Holder, district judge. The petition raises an important question respecting the scope of Rule 35, Fed.R.Civ.P.,1 viz., whether a federal district court has the power to order a mental or physical examination of a person who is a defendant in a tort action. We know of no prior decision directly in point.2

Because the question is fundamental, going to the court’s power to require a medical examination of a defendant in a civil action, we…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Sibbach v. Wilson & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. La Buy v. Howes Leather Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Union Pacific Railway Co. v. BotsfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  4. Ex Parte FaheySupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. Los Angeles Brush Manufacturing Corp. v. JamesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Schlagenhauf v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. American Express Warehousing, Ltd. v. Transamerica Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
  3. Stormo v. StrongSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Shirsat v. Mutual Pharmaceutical Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
  5. Peters v. NelsonDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API