Legal Opinion
Ankerman v. Commissioner of Correction
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided December 4, 2007No. AC 27688PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
2Per curiam
The petitioner, William L. Ankerman, appeals from the judgment of the habeas court denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. On appeal, the petitioner claims that the court improperly (1) concluded, as to count one of the petition, that he was not denied the effective assistance of trial counsel, and (2) denied the petition as to counts two and three, which alleged that certain witnesses had perjured themselves. We reverse the judgment only as to count three of the habeas petition.
The petitioner was convicted of larceny in the first degree by embezzlement in connection with the…
3Cases cited11 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Campfield v. Stickman, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at GreeneSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Milner v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- McClendon v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by8 opinions
- Vazquez v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- Ankerman v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- Bell v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
- Delgado v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Asif v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.