Legal Opinion

Delgado v. Commissioner of Correction

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided May 26, 2009No. AC 29199PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PETERS, J.

Claims of judicial error that a criminal defendant failed to raise on direct appeal are renewable in a petition for habeas corpus only if the petitioner can show “cause and prejudice” for his prior default. Cobham v. Commissioner of Correction, 258 Conn. 30, 40, 779 A.2d 80 (2001). To comply with this requirement, “the petitioner must demonstrate good cause for his failure to raise a claim at trial or on direct appeal and actual prejudice resulting from the impropriety claimed in the habeas petition.” Id. In this case, in the absence of such a showing, the habeas court not…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Simms v. Warden, State PrisonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  2. Cobham v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
  3. State v. DelgadoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  4. Taylor v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  5. Ankerman v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ankerman v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
  2. Bartlett v. Metropolitan District CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
  3. Delgado v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2024
  4. Antonio A. v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2021
  5. Delgado v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API