Legal Opinion
Milner v. Commissioner of Correction
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 19, 2001No. AC 19130PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PELLEGRINO, J.
The petitioner, Clinton Milner, appeals from the judgment dismissing his petition for a writ of habeas corpus following his conviction, after a jury trial, of murder in violation of General Statutes § 53a-54a. On appeal, the petitioner claims that the habeas court improperly concluded that (1) his right *728to due process was not violated by the state’s failure to conduct more specific and timely testing of blood evidence and (2) he was not denied effective assistance of counsel.1 We affirm the judgment of the habeas court.
The following facts and procedural history are…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Engle v. IsaacSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Arizona v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Fitzgerald Council v. Com'r of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Correia v. RowlandSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Mamudovski v. BIC Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Mejia v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Almedina v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.